This Community Group provides a lightweight venue to facilitate discussion between Web Browser vendors, as well as other interested parties, in order to establish a set of standards for interoperable browser extensions.
Several browser vendors have already started converging towards a common approach, based on the model and APIs initially developed by Google for Chrome. This Community Group aims to ensure actual interoperability rather than mere similarity.
As the specifications developed in the Community Group mature and as Browser Vendors confirm intent to implement them, this community group may consider migrating them to the appropirate W3C Working Group where they can be put on the Recommendation track with appropriate status and Intellectual Property (IP) considerations.
When existing specifications already worked on in other groups cover topics needed for interoperable browser extensions, this group will gather use cases and requirements to inform the design of these specifications, and communicate them to the relevant group.
Specifying the APIs, execution model and security model that form the basis of the cross browser exentions. Existing end-user documentation, as provided by Google, Opera, or Mozilla give a good indication of what is needed.
Specify other APIs on top of that common core to offer additional functionality.
To minimize repackaging overhead for authors, and so that extensions can actually run in any (standards compliant) browser, even if the author overlooked some of them, consider specifying:
This group will develop specifications, possibly supported by test suites, and may also write notes. The exact list of documents that need to be written to achieve the group’s goals is not fully determined at the time of writing this charter, and will be one of the first work items of this Community group.
All deliverables of this Community Group will use the W3C Software and Document License.
This group maintains an index of the documents it is working on.
This group will conduct all of its technical work publicly, primarily using the email@example.com mailing list (archives) for high level discussions, and github for technical contributions (See Contribution Mechanics).
Teleconferences and face-to-face meetings are not held regularly, but may be occasionally when necessary, provided sufficient advance notice is given. Minutes of any such meeting will be posted to the group’s public mailing list in a timely manner, and any resolution will be recorded in github (See Decision Policy).
Specifications, notes, and test suites produced by this Community Group are hosted on the group’s Github.
The group uses an internal mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) for administrative purposes, such as organizing meetings, requesting commit access to Github, etc. Up-to-date information about the group is maintained at the Browser Extension Community Group’s wiki on Github.
This group will seek to make decisions when there is consensus, and favors proposals that create the weakest objections. This is preferred over proposals that are supported by a large majority but that cause strong objections from a few people. When the Chair puts a question and observes dissent, after due consideration of different opinions, the Chair should record a decision (possibly after a vote) and any objections, and move on.
Any resolution taken in a face-to-face meeting or a teleconference will be recorded in the relevant specification’s github issue list, and is to be considered provisional until 10 working days after publication. If no objections are raised on within that time, the resolution will be considered to have consensus as a resolution of the Community Group.
When working on non contentious topics and early drafts, Editors are trusted to make progress without needing an explicit resolution for every change. However, they should seek feedback from the Community Group and publish regular status updates via the public mailing list. This allows group participants to monitor progress without having to directly watch every repo.
The group operates under the Community and Business Group Process. Terms of in this charter that conflict with those of the Community and Business Group Process are void.
As with other Community Groups, W3C seeks organizational licensing commitments under the W3C Community Contributor License Agreement (CLA) (Proposals in this Community Group charter are applicable “Specification” in the CLA). When people request to participate without representing their organization’s legal interests, W3C will in general approve those requests for this group with the following understanding: W3C will seek and expect an organizational commitment under the CLA starting with the individual’s first request to make a contribution to a group deliverable. The section on Contribution Mechanics describes how W3C expects to monitor these contribution requests.
Community Group participants agree to make contributions in the GitHub repo for the project that they are interested in. This may be in the form of a pull request (preferred), by raising an issue, or by adding a comment to an existing issue.
The Community Group mailing list must not be used for discussing details of specific projects.
Specifications created for proposals in the Community Group must use the W3C Software and Document License.
All Github repositories attached to the Community Group must contain a copy of the CONTRIBUTING and LICENSE files.
Note: this CG will not use a contrib mailing list for contributions since all contributions will be tracked via Github mechanisms (e.g. pull requests).
Participants in this group choose their Chair(s) and can replace their Chair(s) at any time using whatever means they prefer.
However, if 5 participants —no two from the same organization— call for an election, the group must use the following process to replace any current Chair(s) with a new Chair, consulting the Community Development Lead on election operations (e.g., voting infrastructure and using RFC 2777).
Participants dissatisfied with the outcome of an election may ask the Community Development Lead to intervene. The Community Development Lead, after evaluating the election, may take any action including no action.
This Charter can be amended by the Chairs with consultation of the Community Group, if the change is agreed to by W3C’s Community Development Lead (Community Development Lead is described in the CG Process).